Why White People Should Not Wear “Mohawks” or Dreadlocks

[Logikal Ethix]

By: Colin Kennedy Donovan and Qwo-Li Driskill
http://www.makezine.org/mohawksdreads.htm

A Few Good Reasons Why White People Should Not Wear “Mohawks” or Dreadlocks:

“Mohawk” is the name of a sovereign First Nation in the Iroquois Confederacy. Wearing “Mohawks” erases Mohawk people and culture.



Dreadlocks are a symbol of Black/African pride and resistance to white supremacist beauty standards and are rooted in Black/African struggles for survival and liberation.



Dreadlocks are rooted in Rastafarianism, a pan-African spiritual/religious movement for healing and decolonization for Africa and African people worldwide. Rastafarianism is a form of resistance to a history of white racism, slavery, colonization and genocide.



The traditions of people of color/non-white people are still under attack across the planet. Appropriating our traditions and ways of dressing/presenting is a further attack on our communities.



Wearing “Mohawks” or dreadlocks plays into a racist society that believes people of color and our lands, bodies, cultures and spirits are up for grabs.



“Mohawks” were popularized in Britain and North America because of the film “The Taxi Driver.”



Appropriating other cultures means you neglect looking at your own ethnic roots and traditions.



By wearing “Mohawks” and dreadlocks, white people demonstrate they are unaware of anti-racist struggles and deteriorate trust between white and people of color/non-white people.



Being an anti-racist white person is counter-culture. Trying to present a counter-cultural image by appropriating other cultures is not.



The hairstyle called “Mohawks” is rooted in distinct Iroquois and other First Nations/Native traditions that have only recently (1978) been legal in the United States. Non-native people who wear “Mohawks” appear naïve and condescending to this reality.



By cutting off their “Mohawks” and dreadlocks, white people take a concrete step towards an anti-racist journey.





Created by Qwo-Li Driskill and Colin Kennedy Donovan for

Planting Seeds Community Awareness Project. www.pscap.org

The struggle against racism is more than just not saying racist comments or knowing that the United States was built by slave labor. It is also a struggle to recognize and understand the ways racism/white supremacy are woven into every aspect of life.



One of the ways racism plays out which is often ignored or not seen by white people is through appropriation, “the act of taking or making use of without authority or right.” Appropriation ignores the lives and struggles of oppressed communities, and instead takes what is seen as interesting, useful or beautiful, disregarding our cultures and lives. In the US and other countries, appropriation is part of long histories of racism and genocide. Colonial governments and peoples appropriated the homelands of First Nations/Native people. Europeans appropriated the bodies and labor of African peoples during slavery.



While our bodies, homelands and labor continue to be appropriated, so do our cultural symbols/lifeways. The New Age movement, for example, appropriates (and twists) the spiritual practices of First Nations, Asian, African and other cultures.



Among progressive/radical white people, the problem of appropriation continues to damage communities of color. Mohawks and dreadlocks worn by non-Native/non-African people is one form of appropriation that often goes unnoticed and unchallenged and is often misunderstood.



Healing the legacy and current reality of racism and colonization means looking closely at the ways we perpetuate these forms of violence. It means, in part, letting go of cultural symbols that are appropriated from people of color/non-white people and instead looking deeply at the complex issues that surround race and racism.







But, I’m not trying to appropriate anything. I just appreciate other cultures. Isn’t that okay?



Appreciating other cultures does not mean you need to appropriate any aspect of them. A true appreciation of other cultures means fighting against the forces trying to destroy them, not taking them on as your own.



It’s just a Mohawk. I don’t think of it as a Native thing.


And therein lies the problem.



But, I wear my hair this way as a statement against oppressive cultures and governments. How is that racist?



You can take a stand against oppression and dominant cultures without appropriating the cultures of the people being hurt by them. Appropriation actually enforces oppression, it does not stand against it. Appropriation is part of the problem, not part of the solution.



This is a free country. Can’t I do whatever I want?



This country has never been free for people of color/non-white people. Certainly, you can choose wear your hair however you want. Historically, however, people of color have not been able to make that choice. For instance, in the US and Canada Native children were forced to cut their hair and wear it like white people’s in “boarding” or “residential” schools created to destroy First Nations cultures. Slavery was an act of owning humans. Enslaved people had no legal right to do anything with their bodies. Their bodies were private property. When white people wear “Mohawks” or dreadlocks it twists those hairstyles into symbols of privilege rather than symbols or survival and resistance. By: Colin Kennedy Donovan and Qwo-Li Driskill
http://www.makezine.org/mohawksdreads.htm

A Few Good Reasons Why White People Should Not Wear “Mohawks” or Dreadlocks:

“Mohawk” is the name of a sovereign First Nation in the Iroquois Confederacy. Wearing “Mohawks” erases Mohawk people and culture.



Dreadlocks are a symbol of Black/African pride and resistance to white supremacist beauty standards and are rooted in Black/African struggles for survival and liberation.



Dreadlocks are rooted in Rastafarianism, a pan-African spiritual/religious movement for healing and decolonization for Africa and African people worldwide. Rastafarianism is a form of resistance to a history of white racism, slavery, colonization and genocide.



The traditions of people of color/non-white people are still under attack across the planet. Appropriating our traditions and ways of dressing/presenting is a further attack on our communities.



Wearing “Mohawks” or dreadlocks plays into a racist society that believes people of color and our lands, bodies, cultures and spirits are up for grabs.



“Mohawks” were popularized in Britain and North America because of the film “The Taxi Driver.”



Appropriating other cultures means you neglect looking at your own ethnic roots and traditions.



By wearing “Mohawks” and dreadlocks, white people demonstrate they are unaware of anti-racist struggles and deteriorate trust between white and people of color/non-white people.



Being an anti-racist white person is counter-culture. Trying to present a counter-cultural image by appropriating other cultures is not.



The hairstyle called “Mohawks” is rooted in distinct Iroquois and other First Nations/Native traditions that have only recently (1978) been legal in the United States. Non-native people who wear “Mohawks” appear naïve and condescending to this reality.



By cutting off their “Mohawks” and dreadlocks, white people take a concrete step towards an anti-racist journey.





Created by Qwo-Li Driskill and Colin Kennedy Donovan for

Planting Seeds Community Awareness Project. www.pscap.org

The struggle against racism is more than just not saying racist comments or knowing that the United States was built by slave labor. It is also a struggle to recognize and understand the ways racism/white supremacy are woven into every aspect of life.



One of the ways racism plays out which is often ignored or not seen by white people is through appropriation, “the act of taking or making use of without authority or right.” Appropriation ignores the lives and struggles of oppressed communities, and instead takes what is seen as interesting, useful or beautiful, disregarding our cultures and lives. In the US and other countries, appropriation is part of long histories of racism and genocide. Colonial governments and peoples appropriated the homelands of First Nations/Native people. Europeans appropriated the bodies and labor of African peoples during slavery.



While our bodies, homelands and labor continue to be appropriated, so do our cultural symbols/lifeways. The New Age movement, for example, appropriates (and twists) the spiritual practices of First Nations, Asian, African and other cultures.



Among progressive/radical white people, the problem of appropriation continues to damage communities of color. Mohawks and dreadlocks worn by non-Native/non-African people is one form of appropriation that often goes unnoticed and unchallenged and is often misunderstood.



Healing the legacy and current reality of racism and colonization means looking closely at the ways we perpetuate these forms of violence. It means, in part, letting go of cultural symbols that are appropriated from people of color/non-white people and instead looking deeply at the complex issues that surround race and racism.







But, I’m not trying to appropriate anything. I just appreciate other cultures. Isn’t that okay?



Appreciating other cultures does not mean you need to appropriate any aspect of them. A true appreciation of other cultures means fighting against the forces trying to destroy them, not taking them on as your own.



It’s just a Mohawk. I don’t think of it as a Native thing.


And therein lies the problem.



But, I wear my hair this way as a statement against oppressive cultures and governments. How is that racist?



You can take a stand against oppression and dominant cultures without appropriating the cultures of the people being hurt by them. Appropriation actually enforces oppression, it does not stand against it. Appropriation is part of the problem, not part of the solution.



This is a free country. Can’t I do whatever I want?



This country has never been free for people of color/non-white people. Certainly, you can choose wear your hair however you want. Historically, however, people of color have not been able to make that choice. For instance, in the US and Canada Native children were forced to cut their hair and wear it like white people’s in “boarding” or “residential” schools created to destroy First Nations cultures. Slavery was an act of owning humans. Enslaved people had no legal right to do anything with their bodies. Their bodies were private property. When white people wear “Mohawks” or dreadlocks it twists those hairstyles into symbols of privilege rather than symbols or survival and resistance. By: Colin Kennedy Donovan and Qwo-Li Driskill
http://www.makezine.org/mohawksdreads.htm

A Few Good Reasons Why White People Should Not Wear “Mohawks” or Dreadlocks:

“Mohawk” is the name of a sovereign First Nation in the Iroquois Confederacy. Wearing “Mohawks” erases Mohawk people and culture.



Dreadlocks are a symbol of Black/African pride and resistance to white supremacist beauty standards and are rooted in Black/African struggles for survival and liberation.



Dreadlocks are rooted in Rastafarianism, a pan-African spiritual/religious movement for healing and decolonization for Africa and African people worldwide. Rastafarianism is a form of resistance to a history of white racism, slavery, colonization and genocide.



The traditions of people of color/non-white people are still under attack across the planet. Appropriating our traditions and ways of dressing/presenting is a further attack on our communities.



Wearing “Mohawks” or dreadlocks plays into a racist society that believes people of color and our lands, bodies, cultures and spirits are up for grabs.



“Mohawks” were popularized in Britain and North America because of the film “The Taxi Driver.”



Appropriating other cultures means you neglect looking at your own ethnic roots and traditions.



By wearing “Mohawks” and dreadlocks, white people demonstrate they are unaware of anti-racist struggles and deteriorate trust between white and people of color/non-white people.



Being an anti-racist white person is counter-culture. Trying to present a counter-cultural image by appropriating other cultures is not.



The hairstyle called “Mohawks” is rooted in distinct Iroquois and other First Nations/Native traditions that have only recently (1978) been legal in the United States. Non-native people who wear “Mohawks” appear naïve and condescending to this reality.



By cutting off their “Mohawks” and dreadlocks, white people take a concrete step towards an anti-racist journey.





Created by Qwo-Li Driskill and Colin Kennedy Donovan for

Planting Seeds Community Awareness Project. www.pscap.org

The struggle against racism is more than just not saying racist comments or knowing that the United States was built by slave labor. It is also a struggle to recognize and understand the ways racism/white supremacy are woven into every aspect of life.



One of the ways racism plays out which is often ignored or not seen by white people is through appropriation, “the act of taking or making use of without authority or right.” Appropriation ignores the lives and struggles of oppressed communities, and instead takes what is seen as interesting, useful or beautiful, disregarding our cultures and lives. In the US and other countries, appropriation is part of long histories of racism and genocide. Colonial governments and peoples appropriated the homelands of First Nations/Native people. Europeans appropriated the bodies and labor of African peoples during slavery.



While our bodies, homelands and labor continue to be appropriated, so do our cultural symbols/lifeways. The New Age movement, for example, appropriates (and twists) the spiritual practices of First Nations, Asian, African and other cultures.



Among progressive/radical white people, the problem of appropriation continues to damage communities of color. Mohawks and dreadlocks worn by non-Native/non-African people is one form of appropriation that often goes unnoticed and unchallenged and is often misunderstood.



Healing the legacy and current reality of racism and colonization means looking closely at the ways we perpetuate these forms of violence. It means, in part, letting go of cultural symbols that are appropriated from people of color/non-white people and instead looking deeply at the complex issues that surround race and racism.







But, I’m not trying to appropriate anything. I just appreciate other cultures. Isn’t that okay?



Appreciating other cultures does not mean you need to appropriate any aspect of them. A true appreciation of other cultures means fighting against the forces trying to destroy them, not taking them on as your own.



It’s just a Mohawk. I don’t think of it as a Native thing.


And therein lies the problem.



But, I wear my hair this way as a statement against oppressive cultures and governments. How is that racist?



You can take a stand against oppression and dominant cultures without appropriating the cultures of the people being hurt by them. Appropriation actually enforces oppression, it does not stand against it. Appropriation is part of the problem, not part of the solution.



This is a free country. Can’t I do whatever I want?



This country has never been free for people of color/non-white people. Certainly, you can choose wear your hair however you want. Historically, however, people of color have not been able to make that choice. For instance, in the US and Canada Native children were forced to cut their hair and wear it like white people’s in “boarding” or “residential” schools created to destroy First Nations cultures. Slavery was an act of owning humans. Enslaved people had no legal right to do anything with their bodies. Their bodies were private property. When white people wear “Mohawks” or dreadlocks it twists those hairstyles into symbols of privilege rather than symbols or survival and resistance.
_________________
http://www.myspace.com/logikalethix

[tha 1 who Trevs]

alright, i guess i'm gonna hafta step up to this one.

i'll start off by saying i'm not really sure how to "defend" my dreads; but then i'm not even really sure how to defend my never trying drugs or alcohol besides by saying "it's just not me."

i know that people all over tha world, even Celtic people, have had some kinds of dreads through history, but i feel uneasy using that as a point of contention because it bears vague similarity to tha "European immigrants had a hard time too" argument.

but related to that, dreads will come naturally to all people's hair given time - i have White friends who travel cross-country on boxcars that get dreads just from not washing. however that doesn't apply to me, since i made my dreads intentionally.

then i could say something like "what if a White person wears dreadlocks as a signifier that all peoples are from Africa originally." but then i'm not gonna argue that White people should be able to use tha "n-word" based on that logic, either.

also, what if tha White dread is similarly expressing opposition to White standards of beauty? would living up to those standards be less, or more counter-revolutionary?

i realize this is a tricky topic, and i'm trying to work with it.

a possible reason i can come up with is that its an attempt to discount some of my White privilege. although obviously being a White person with dreads is more acceptable here in Toronto, back in my hicksville home-town on tha eastern shore of Maryland it was a little different. i wasn't "just another White kid with dreads," was the only person with dreads. for a while when i didn't have dreads, i hated crossing tha border with such ease while anyone of colour was harassed.

and i don't know if this will help or hurt my argument, but beyond all tha baggage they carry, i like my dreads aesthetically. i definitely prefer having long hair, and i find it much more manageable when it's locked up. i like how they look on me, and people say they fit me (people have even told me they don't think most White people could look good with dreadlocks but they work for me). i don't want to come off as ignoring any racial implications but everything has its mitigating factors.
_________________

[UNKNOWNMIZERY]

I agree to a certain extent, i feel it is wrong if the person who is not from that 'direct' culture does not aknowledge it. I.e. Non Africans involved in hip hop should reckognize that hip hop is rooted african culture.

FOr the dreads however, South Asian histiory shows that INdia had many rastas from ancient time, they were just reffeered to as pundits.
_________________
www.mutescreamz.com

"the bitter road is the right road/ no one said it was easy"

[julio]

Again, I have to remind you guys that you are wrong historically. Dreadlocks were wore by white people long ago, before the advent of rastafarianism. Vikings and the scotts and I'm sure other races all have been known to as well. You need to stop blackening everything and calling it your own. I seen just now someone waving a Canadian flag done in black and white on much music. I find that offensive as the colour of the flag is red and white. You need to come up with your own thing and stop copying others ideas, changing it black, and then trying to accuse people of stealing your coppied ideas, ie black Jesus.

[tha 1 who Trevs]

OK now i have to post and say i disagree with almost everything he just said
_________________